Jump to [ the menus | page content | search facility ]


This site's design is only visible in a graphical browser that supports web standards, but its content is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

Institute of Ideas in association with Pfizer

WHAT IS SCIENCE EDUCATION FOR?

The advocates of the new thinking in science education put great store by their emphasis on science education for the citizen, otherwise known as ‘scientific literacy’. But will turning off the Bunsen Burners and forcing students to focus on scientific issues and controversies encourage budding scientists, or put them off even more? In this provocative essay David Perks, head of physics at a London state secondary school, argues that attempts to make school science more popular by making it more ‘relevant’ are giving today’s students a watered-down science education that will not produce the scientists we need.

The IoI has launched a dedicated Science Education Project page to follow developments in this area and provide commentary on issues addressed in 'What is science education for'

Respondents include:

Sir Richard Sykes, Rector of Imperial College, London:

‘David Perks’ first-rate exposition of the issues surrounding science education in our schools … may make uncomfortable reading.’

Michael Reiss, Director of Education at the Royal Society:

‘All curriculum reforms meet resistance … [B]oth for reasons of practicality and because I am suspicious of monolithic arguments, I see a role for a diversity of aims of science education.’

Simon Singh, science writer:

‘Every politician responsible for education, science or industry over the past 20 years has allowed science education to decline miserably in terms of its mission to create new scientists.’

Mary Warnock:

‘The new GCSE class could take as its textbook a series of cuttings from, say, the Daily Mail on one hand and the Guardian on the other. Far too much teaching at school has already degenerated into this kind of debate (think, for example, of religious education or philosophy), more suitable for the pub than the school-room.’

Dr Peter Martin, lecturer at the Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford:

‘The trends that Perks argues have been detrimental to GCSE science are all-pervasive, even at the highest levels of education.’

To order your copy of WHAT IS SCIENCE EDUCATION FOR? (price £10 including P&P) telephone 020 7269 9220 or order online here.


Media coverage of 'What is science education for?

  • Science elite rejects new GCSE as ‘fit for the pub’, The Times, Mark Henderson & Alexandra Blair, 11 October 2006
  • Science friction, The Times, leader comment, 11 October 2006
  • Critics attack new science GCSE, BBC Online, 11 October 2006
  • New science GCSE comes under attack, by Alexandra Smith Education Guardian, 11 October 2006
  • GCSE science equips students for the real world, Letters to the Editor, The Times, 12 October 2006
  • Britain has at last escaped the illusion that salvation lies in mass science, by Simon Jenkins, the Guardian, 13 October 2006
  • New GCSE science gets a mixed reception, Letters to the Editor, The Times, 13 October 2006
  • Who’s killing science?, by Becky McCall, Guardian, 17 October 2006
  • View from the lab, by Professor Steve Jones, Daily Telegraph, 17 October 2006