Jump to [ the menus | page content | search facility ]


This site's design is only visible in a graphical browser that supports web standards, but its content is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

Past Events

The IoI in association with the European Dana Alliance for the Brain presents
Children and their brains
the science and politics of early years development
Venue: Dana Centre, 165 Queen's Gate, South Kensington, London SW7
Date: February 3, 2005
Time: 6.30 - 9pm
Tickets: Free, but booking required
Booking: Call 020 7942 4040 or email tickets@danacentre.org.uk
For further information please contact Claire Fox at the Institute of Ideas, or Elaine Snell at the European Dana Alliance for the Brain.

An evening symposium and a debate on neuroscience and infant development organised by the Institute of Ideas in association with the European Dana Alliance for the Brain, brings together a panel of speakers who will look a the issues afresh with differing perspectives. The event will examine exactly what neuroscience can and cannot tell us about infant development and the political and social context in which these findings are being interpreted.

Neuroscience is beginning to yield tremendous gains in helping us understand how children develop. Exciting new insights are having an effect in the spheres of politics and education policy. In America, both the Democrats and Republicans have drawn on new brain research to inform policies relating to families and children. At a conference on early child development and learning at the White House in 1997, then First Lady Hillary Clinton noted that ‘everything we do with a child...determine(s) how their brains are wired’. In 2001 her successor Laura Bush hosted a White House 'Summit on Early Childhood Cognitive Development'. At this she claimed science confirms, ‘What a child experiences from day one to grade one has a direct and profound impact on his future’. In the UK, Minister for Children Margaret Hodge cites scientific evidence for a range of early years initiatives such as SureStart Schemes and Early Excellence Centres. In education, debates about learning styles, creativity and assessment techniques all claim the credibility of evidence from brain science.

- Is neuroscience being hijacked by politicians, and is scientific evidence thereby being over-claimed for - or even misrepresented - in the policy arena?

- Is neuroscience really overturning old theories of learning and development, or is it being used to give credibility to fashionable theories of questionable benefit to children’s education?

-Is there a danger of being overly deterministic about developments in early years?

6.30 - 7.30pmExamining the evidence and the context of the debate

Professor Guy Claxton
University of Bristol; author of Hare Brain, Tortoise Mind: Why Intelligence Increases When You Think Less
Professor Norbert Herschkowitz
paediatric neuroscientist, Switzerland; author of A Good Start in Life: Understanding Your Child's Brain and Behaviour from Birth to Age 6

Chair

Wendy Earle
resources editor, British Film Institute; Institute of Ideas Education Forum

7.45 - 9pmPanel debate, followed by audience discussion

Rebecca Abrams
family advice columnist, Daily Telegraph; author of several books, including Three Shoes, One Sock and No Hairbrush: Everything You Need To Know About Having Your Second Child
Dr Helene Guldberg
associate lecturer in child development at the Open University and managing editor of the online publication spiked; author of The Myth of Infant Determinism
Bill Lucas
patron of the Campaign for Learning; author of Power up your mind, Help your child to succeed and Be Creative and Discover your hidden talents (forthcoming)
Dr Helen Penn
Professor of Early Childhood at the University of East London and research fellow at the Institute of Education, London University; author of Understanding Early Childhood: Issues and Controversies

Chair

Claire Fox
director, Institute of Ideas